|
| "Fairechild
said that the mostly non-lethal dangers of air travel amount to one of
the great unexplored environmental health issues of the day...Considering
how many of us this affects, this lone voice is well worth hearing." -Copley
Newspapers |
| "Diana
Fairechild, a highly respected consumer advocate for the flying public...'"
-Ambassadair Travel Club |
| "Diana
Fairechild likens air flight to childbirth. In her simile the passenger
is like the baby and the jet the womb which, unlike mom's, fails to adequately
sustain the well-being of its inhabitants." -Maui News |
| "Flyana.com
can help you with everything from jetlag to lost luggage! The site's creator
calls herself a passenger advocate, and she's written several books on
the subject as well. The goal of the site is to calm public fears about
flying and make the experience more enjoyable." -NBC4-TV |
| "Fairechild
has a bag of carry-on health tricks larger than fits in the overhead compartment,
all included in her book, Jet Smarter." -American Bar Association Journal
|
| "Fairechild
explains how recycled air on planes contributes to air rage and in spreading
infectious diseases." -Art Bell, Coast to Coast AM |
| "Diana
Fairechild, a former flight attendant who writes about and does consulting
on the health risks of flying, says some frequent travelers fail to connect
the dots between their travels and chronic ailments." -New York Times
|
| "Take
the advice of Diana Fairechild." Smart Money |
| "Diana
Fairechild's book Jet Smart dropped a bomb in Washington and the Environmental
Protection Agency and the Department of Transportation changed policy."
- Environ |
| "Diana
Fairechild describes her reactions to the chemicals and how it has caused
massive allergic reactions to a broad spectrum of chemicals. She now spends
her time writing books about air travel and fighting to ban the spraying
of pesticides on aircraft." -Stone Phillips, Dateline NBC |
| "Fairechild
says on certain international flights, 'attendants are required to empty
half a dozen cans of pesticide into the passengers' air supply en route.'"
-Conde Nast Traveler |
|
|
|
|
|
DEAR
DIANA
"As
a flight attendant, I was exposed on to APU oil aboard an Airbus. Prior to
that, during a routine physical, my blood work was normal. After my exposure,
my blood showed elevated levels in my liver. I now suffer from hypothyroidism.
Two other flight attendants were also exposed and are now experiencing similar
health problems. Our employer, U.S. Airways, has refused compensation for
us."-JR
DEAR JR
I
am sorry to hear about your health problems. Researchers now blame chemical
poisoning for many illnesses, though they go by a variety of names including
Gulf War Syndrome, Sick Building Sydrome, Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS),
Environmental Illness, and Toxic Induced Loss of Tolerance (TILT).
In addition,
neuro-degenerative diseases linked to toxins include lupus, multiple sclerosis,
Parkinson's, and lymphoma. Even Alzheimers apparently needs an enviromental
trigger.
Autoimmune
diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and diabetes are also tracked to toxins.
My
NONI book introduces more about this subject and here
is a narrative was written in 1991 by James M. Miller, M.D., as part of the
court record in my attempt to get Workers' Compensation from United Airlines
for poisoning her in my workplace, which I believe will be helpful to you
in understanding this problem.
----
"Humans,
like all living creatures, are by nature biochemical organisms. Our continued
good health is dependent upon the proper functioning of innumerable enzymes
participating in an enormous number of biochemical reactions.
"These reactions must take place at the proper time, at the proper rate,
to the proper extent. We see, smell, taste, hear, balance, walk, talk, chew,
swallow, reproduce, sleep, think, and remember as a result of the proper
functioning and proper balance of the many biochemical processes that support
these functions.
"Chemicals enter our bodies through the skin, the gastrointestinal tract,
and the respiratory tract. Certain substances are useful to the body and
support its biochemical mechanisms, while others are not useful or are even
harmful. The latter are called xenobiotics. We exercise relatively little
ability to be selective and tend to take in some of all the chemical substances
presented, whether they are desirable or not.
"Once in the body, chemicals are distributed by the blood to all organs.
Chemical substances, which are not inert, have the capacity to combine with
the chemical substances of the tissues, forming new compounds and altering
the function of the tissue elements with which they have combined.
"A xenobiotic that combines with an enzyme will alter the function of that
enzyme. As a result, the chemical reaction dependent upon that enzyme may
become too slow, ineffective, or perhaps not take place at all. This would
result in either a deficiency of some essential substance or an accumulation
of some intermediate substance, both of which are harmful to the coordinated,
balanced, physical/chemical mechanisms of the body. Xenobiotics can combine
with and alter the function of any tissue component in the body, i.e., cell
membranes, proteins, as well as enzymes.
"We are fortunate in that we are endowed with an excess capacity in all our
organ systems. We have two kidneys but can survive on the functional capacity
of one normal kidney. We have two lungs but can survive on just one.
"The capacity of most of our enzymes and biochemical processes is greater
than we usually require. Because of the excess capacity in all our organ
systems, we are able to sustain considerable injury and diminution in functional
capacity before there is any organ malfunction and therefore any symptoms.
Xenobiotic chemicals do their damage to our body's chemical mechanisms one
molecule at a time.
"Individuals exposed to xenobiotic chemicals on a regular basis will experience
regular injuries that will accumulate over time to eventually result in organ
malfunction.
"Whether or not one develops illness from chemicals depends upon the extent
of the injury caused by any given exposure, the rate at which the injury
can be repaired, and the frequency with which the exposure and the injury
are repeated.
"If
one goes to work and sustains an eight-hour exposure to a solvent, some of
the solvent will enter the body and combine with some of the tissue components
causing a finite amount of injury. This is true even though the level of
the solvent exposure may never have exceeded the OSHA standard or any other
standard that might be considered "safe." If the injury can be completely
healed in the sixteen off-duty hours, the individual returns to work at 100%
capacity and the situation is sustainable indefinitely. If the extent of
the injury is greater than can be repaired in the sixteen off-duty hours,
the individual returns to work at less than 100% capacity.
"This sequence of events will be repeated each work day and the individual
will accumulate injuries, injuries which will eventually lead to erosion
of the excess functional capacity and organ malfunction. This process will
remain unnoticed until the loss of functional capacity results in symptoms.
At this point, the slightest increase in this dose of the xenobiotic in question
will provoke symptoms each and every time it is encountered.
"There is a period of time when the injury is occurring but the excess capacity
has not yet been eroded away, so there are no symptoms. There is another
period where the extent of the damage results in symptoms but the individual
can still sustain life and might recover if the exposure were to be terminated,
although not necessarily without residual damage.
"There
is the final period where organ damage is irreversible and incompatible with
life. This sequence pertains to exposures to chemicals such as cyanide, solvents,
pesticides and any other chemical capable of entering the body.
"Sensitivity
to a chemical results when the previous exposures to that chemical, and/or
other xenobiotics, have caused sufficient cumulative injury that the excess
functional capacity has been eroded away. At this point, a chemical exposure
that appeared to be well tolerated previously is no longer tolerated, and
is now encroaching on vital capacity.
"It
is a common observation that individuals who become sensitive to one chemical
often begin to react to others. This is because the body has a limited number
of detoxification mechanisms.
"When the mechanism has been damaged, all chemicals that are eliminated through
that mechanism will not be well handled and will provoke symptoms. Individuals
vary greatly in their abilities to resist the damaging effects of chemicals.
It is always the individuals with the least capacity to tolerate chemicals
who are the first to become sick. Others in the group might tolerate the
same chemical exposure indefinitely without apparent illness.
"Nobody in the world today is free from some degree of chemical body burden.
Individual tolerances and exposures may vary greatly, but we are all somewhere
on the spectrum between minimal burden and having taken on that last bit
of chemical that pushes us over the brink into a state of chronic illness."
|